From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 19:01:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652B916A400; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:01:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mij@bitchx.it) Received: from aa014msr.fastwebnet.it (aa014msr.fastwebnet.it [85.18.95.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E734613C48E; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mij@bitchx.it) Received: from [1.11.158.102] (1.11.158.102) by aa014msr.fastwebnet.it (7.3.105.6) id 45E7F4020007A309; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:50:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20070302164917.GA28444@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200703011006.l21A6EKZ036332@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070302164917.GA28444@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <44226B29-C2D1-4CF9-A0F9-FC661D5691C5@bitchx.it> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mij Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:49:42 +0100 To: Kris Kennaway X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Cheng-Lung Sung , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/sshguard Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:01:21 -0000 On 02/mar/07, at 17:49, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:06:14AM +0000, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote: >> clsung 2007-03-01 10:06:14 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> security/sshguard Makefile >> Log: >> - respect maintainer's insist on interactive part, >> even IS_INTERACTIVE is discouraged not glad to see such comment > This is disappointing. Can the maintainer explain why? the app requires the user to choose what firewall to support for building: IPFW or PF. They are in XOR and there is no reasonable default in this. Cheng-Lung chose PF default and removed is_interactive. A feedback request would have avoided this qui pro quo. >> - PORTREVISION is thus bumped. >> >> Approved by: maintainer (implicit) > >> | +.if ! ( (defined(WITH_PF) && !defined(WITH_IPFW)) || !defined >> (WITH_PF)) >> | +# some error occurred. Configure will handle this. >> | +.endif > > And what is this? :) this used to be ".error blah" for checking the options' XOR-ness, then removed because options are also set when deinstalling/cleaning etc. Definitely useless, replacing with a comment about the problem appears the best to do. Actually I dunno why this made its way in the submission :) bye