Date: Wed, 1 Nov 1995 17:05:11 +0100 (MET) From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: vince@apollo.COSC.GOV (-Vince-) Cc: julian@ref.tfs.com, jc@irbs.com, current@FreeBSD.org, FAQ@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.1 update Message-ID: <199511011605.RAA17313@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951101032606.15405Q-100000@apollo.COSC.GOV> from "-Vince-" at Nov 1, 95 03:27:21 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems that -Vince- said: > > At some point after 2.1, -CURRENT will probably become 2.3-CURRENT and > > -STABLE will be 2.2-STABLE to end up with 2.2-RELEASE and so on. > > So what you are saying is that -release is really just -current > at some point? and -stable is just really -current before a -release? Not really. What we have *now* is: * 2.1-STABLE will become 2.1-RELEASE * 2.2-CURRENT aka "the Bleeding Edge(tm)". What we will [probably] have is * 2.2-CURRENT become 2.2-STABLE after 2.1-RELEASE is out. It is intended to be 2.2-RELEASE one day. When 2.2-STABLE begins its life, 2.3-CURRENT will begin and so on. Note as I'm not part of the core team so what is above are only my thoughts, they may want to change the numbers :-) -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #5: Mon Oct 30 00:03:29 MET 1995
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511011605.RAA17313>