Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 23:46:24 +0100 From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for help: moving manpages to share/man Message-ID: <Za2ewPU-dge5QpB0@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> In-Reply-To: <CALH631=312%2Bz8-1Gr32gZL_X3QduNCiMEyM3ZOwvqmAh6eRW7A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CALH631=312%2Bz8-1Gr32gZL_X3QduNCiMEyM3ZOwvqmAh6eRW7A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gleb Popov:
> portmgr@ is currently working on switching the directory into which
> man pages are installed from "${PREFIX}/man" to "${PREFIX}/share/man".
>
> I've created a branch [1] in my own fork that switches mandir for the
> autotools build system and am inviting everyone to collaborate on
> that, until all the fallout is fixed. I'm asking port maintainers to
> check if they have ports with the "GNU_CONFIGURE=yes" knob, as these
> are most likely broken by the switch. Moin kindly prepared a list of
> affected ports along with their maintainers (thanks Moin!) [2]
I have definitely more ports that use GNU_CONFIGURE=yes and have
man pages than are on this list. For instance, archivers/gtar.
Am I missing something or is that list incomplete?
Also, there are some instances of GNU_CONFIGURE=Yes in Mk/Uses/*.mk.
Those won't show when looking at ports Makefiles.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Za2ewPU-dge5QpB0>