From owner-freebsd-gnome Wed Mar 13 8:45: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua (alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua [212.9.224.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDED437B416 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:44:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipcard.iptcom.net (ipcard.iptcom.net [212.9.224.5]) by alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA93495; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 18:44:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from vega.vega.com (h194.229.dialup.iptcom.net [212.9.229.194]) by ipcard.iptcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA66472; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 18:44:13 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vega.vega.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g2DGh2B89440; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 18:43:02 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3C8F81D2.7073A72B@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 18:44:02 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Clarke Cc: Richard Kuhns , freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Galeon and Nautilus References: <20020313112751.Y65010-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Joe Clarke wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Richard Kuhns wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 17:48:43 +0200 > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > > Richard Kuhns wrote: > > > > I obviously don't understand. Why not have something like a > > > > "WITH_GALEON" knob for nautilus? > > > > > > Because to Galeon Nautilus component is part of Galeon, not Nautilus, > > > therefore Galeon needs Nautilus installed to build it. > > > > > > -Maxim > > > > OK, thanks. But couldn't galeon look to see if nautilus is already > > installed, and only build the nautilus component if it is? Or does the > > nautilus component need something from the nautilus source? > > We could modify bsd.gnome.mk to use WANT/HAVE_NAUTILUS macros, and check > for nautilus-config (of course nautilus-config is currently broken [I > meant to fix this]). I can cook up some patches if this sounds like a > good idea. Else, the WITHOUT_NAUTILUS knob would work. I have a better idea - see my reply to the same message. Thank you for the proposition anyway. -Maxim > > Joe > > > > > I noticed this particularly today because yesterday I built gnome from > > /usr/ports on a brand new machine. Today I saw the new mozilla/galeon and > > figured I might as well go ahead and upgrade. The mozilla remake took > > some little time (as I expected), but I was surprised to see galeon taking > > as long as it did until I noticed that it was rebuilding nautilus. > > Without nautilus, the galeon build takes about 2 minutes. > > > > -- > > Richard Kuhns rjk@grauel.com > > PO Box 6249 Tel: (765)477-6000 \ > > 100 Sawmill Road x319 > > Lafayette, IN 47903 (800)489-4891 / > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message