From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul  3 09:50:58 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC78D1065687
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  3 Jul 2008 09:50:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (ns.ciam.ru [213.247.195.75])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9083A8FC20
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  3 Jul 2008 09:50:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [77.41.76.79] (helo=[172.16.100.4])
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1KELSr-000AKa-6s; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:50:57 +0400
Message-ID: <486CA0AF.3020602@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:49:35 +0400
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sandra Kachelmann <s.kachelmann@googlemail.com>
References: <91b92520807030156u409783bdh4e46dc6b6e9f600f@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <91b92520807030156u409783bdh4e46dc6b6e9f600f@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current
	version
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:50:59 -0000

Sandra Kachelmann wrote:
> After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command
> 
> $ portversion -vl'<'
> 
> does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I
> found the information useful.
> 
> before:
> gnutls-2.4.0                <  needs updating (port has 2.4.1)
> 
> now:
> gnutls                      <  needs updating (port has 2.4.1)

Looks like it's a side effect of new options implementation. Now you can 
use -Fvl options. But I'll think to back this functionality.

Thanks.
-- 
Dixi.
Sem.