From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Aug 25 15:01:26 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA11886 for isp-outgoing; Sun, 25 Aug 1996 15:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from egate.egate.net (ns.egate.net [207.34.206.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA11877 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 1996 15:01:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from paul-ml@localhost) by egate.egate.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id SAA16556; Sun, 25 Aug 1996 18:00:07 -0400 Date: Sun, 25 Aug 1996 18:00:07 -0400 (EDT) From: "Paul Andersen (ML)" To: Ulf Zimmermann cc: "Mr. Jason A. Borgmann" , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 128k ISDN vs. T1 In-Reply-To: <199608241819.LAA05321@Gatekeeper.Lamb.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Sorry to be rude, but another "Wanna-be-ISP". First it looks like you should > go and read more about what is possible in telecommunication hardware. > Like that ISDN is not upgradable over that 128K. That there exist Fractional > T1. Frame Relay. And so on and so on. For above 128k is there not also Multi-Line load balancing? obviously it requires hardware on both ends that support it but does it now allow it to "break" 128? ----------- Paul Andersen paul@egate.net