From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Apr 20 10:52:48 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA03500
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 10:52:48 -0700
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA03494
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 10:52:46 -0700
Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id KAA14845; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 10:52:21 -0700
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199504201752.KAA14845@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: bootstrap now too large
To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans)
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 10:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199504201711.DAA23471@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Apr 21, 95 03:11:43 am
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 476       
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Adding 'C' to the usage message and the CDROM case to the switch expanded
> my boot blocks by 128 bytes.  They previously had 16 bytes to spare and
> are now 112 bytes too large.
> 
> Apparently gcc generates fat time-optimized code for the switch.

SHit!

Any body with time on their hands ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent'
=> 'no rude people are relevant'