From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 26 20:32:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51487E7D for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121B12B49 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAQKWOBS086693; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:32:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <52950558.60005@rawbw.com> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:32:24 -0800 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon Subject: Re: What is the "thinnest" display manager available? References: <20131126073256.GC788@lena.kiev> <52946150.2060505@rawbw.com> <20131126095907.05990916.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20131126095907.05990916.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:32:30 -0000 On 11/26/2013 00:59, Polytropon wrote: > Is xdm (and as far as I know, also wdm) still an exception > from the "rc.conf rule", or how is it supposed to be started > on "more modern" versions? This is the matter of adding the missing rc script, IMO. Preferably as an xorg PR. Yuri