From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 26 18:04:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FEA9C77; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:d1:b4d6:e600:4261:86ff:fef6:aa2a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7F7534CB; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7QI5Q1Y024844; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:05:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id s7QI5LcY024843; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:05:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from unavailable01.ultimatedns.net ([209.180.214.227]) (UDNSMS authenticated user chrish) by ultimatedns.net with HTTP; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:05:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:05:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: did tar(1) loose xz compression support in 11? From: "Chris H" To: "freebsd current" , "freebsd hackers" User-Agent: UDNSMS/2.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:04:23 -0000 Greetings, I'm currently testing 11. My build / install is from about 2 days ago. I generally use xz compression, when creating archives. But when I attempt the following: tar -cvJ --options xz:9 -f ./archive-name.tar.xz ./file it returns the following: tar: Undefined option: `xz:9' This has always worked in previous versions. Has the syntax changed, and the man(1) pages just haven't caught up? Thank you for all your time, and consideration. --Chris