Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 20:32:29 +0300 From: Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com> To: Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@highsecure.ru> Cc: Henry Hu <henry.hu.sh@gmail.com>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Anton Yuzhaninov <citrin@citrin.ru> Subject: Re: port renaming Message-ID: <CA%2B7WWSerx%2BgWSN0wBg%2BLPfSOu4A=LDZYX1Kn-5hwkY1svnUUpA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55A7E877.3040802@highsecure.ru> References: <55A7B826.2060609@citrin.ru> <CAFb6gngdDLLDiQU%2BwmYE17zmuo3YU=_e_7ruvDVufxGmQuk1=A@mail.gmail.com> <CAEJt7haPtdqbH8RPAYZaMY43F0doN7xtr%2Bz94xv-89rz9%2BzcXQ@mail.gmail.com> <55A7E877.3040802@highsecure.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@highsecure.ru> wrote: > On 16/07/2015 18:11, Henry Hu wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Vsevolod Stakhov >> <vsevolod@highsecure.ru <mailto:vsevolod@highsecure.ru>> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Anton Yuzhaninov <citrin@citrin.ru >> <mailto:citrin@citrin.ru>> wrote: >> > >> > Port maintainers and port commiters, when PORTNAME/PKGNAMEPREFIX/PKGNAMESUFFIX is changed, please note this change in commit log and for important ports also in /usr/ports/UPDATING. Any rename affect at leas some of FreeBSD users and >> > >> > Depends in our local ports was broken and I spent some time to figure out why. >> > It turns out, that PORTNAME for graphics/gd was changed in r324437. >> > No singe word about this rename was added to commit message or UPDATING... >> >> From the perspective of pkg things are even worse, as pkg can no >> longer detect that the renamed package is a replacement for some >> existing one. It breaks many stuff and solver could hardly help to >> resolve this in a pain-less matter. We need something like 'Replace' >> or 'Obsolete' field badly. 'UPDATING' does NOT help to solve this task >> at all. >> >> >> We already have the 'MOVED' file. Does it help? > > It doesn't because: > > 1) it is human readable and not very convenient for parsing; > 2) we must keep this information on per-package basis and not globally; > 3) many items are missing in MOVED (and I've recently missed one when > changing a port, for example) > 4) MOVED contains too many unnecessary information that is useful merely > because we are using archaic version control system (namely, subversion) > > So the answer is no: we need a special field in manifests to make > renaming transparent for pkg and, in turn, for users. > > -- > Vsevolod Stakhov So basically you need a data structure in the pkg metadata that can track all the previous origins for the port (not just the last because ports might have multiple renames). That's quite a tall order I might say. -Kimmo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2B7WWSerx%2BgWSN0wBg%2BLPfSOu4A=LDZYX1Kn-5hwkY1svnUUpA>