From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 10 16:30:07 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id QAA11106 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 10 Jan 1995 16:30:07 -0800 Received: from stargate.np.ac.sg (stargate.np.ac.sg [153.20.24.70]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA11100 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 1995 16:30:04 -0800 Received: (from smap@localhost) by stargate.np.ac.sg (8.6.9/8.6.9) id IAA01107 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 08:11:13 +0800 Message-Id: <199501110011.IAA01107@stargate.np.ac.sg> Received: from titan.np.ac.sg(153.20.24.72) by stargate.np.ac.sg via smap (V1.3) id sma001104; Wed Jan 11 08:11:01 1995 Subject: Re: Filesystem(?) preformance - 1.x and 2.0 To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.sax.de Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1995 08:10:50 +0800 (SST) From: SysAdmin - Ng Pheng Siong Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199501101501.QAA07760@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de> from "J Wunsch" at Jan 10, 95 04:01:59 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Length: 650 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk J"org wrote: > Did you by incident run pccons on your 1.1.X system? Pccons has been > *way* simpler than either syscons or pcvt (though the latest pcvt is > again almost as fast as [at least NetBSD's -- they still have it] > pccons). By Jove, you're right! I simply took defaults, and have not noticed the defaults were different. However, the 2 boxen I'm doing these things on are on our Internet DMZ, and are in a (cold and noisy) machine room. I'm doing this via telnet from my desktop: are the console drivers involved? TIA. Cheers. - PS -- Ng Pheng Siong * lsys@np.ac.sg * ngps@np.ac.sg Computer Centre, Ngee Ann Polytechnic, Singapore