From owner-cvs-all  Fri Aug  2  8: 7: 8 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0052E37B405; Fri,  2 Aug 2002 08:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EE8A243E84; Fri,  2 Aug 2002 08:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua)
Received: (from ru@localhost)
	by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g72F4r768216;
	Fri, 2 Aug 2002 18:04:53 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from ru)
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 18:04:53 +0300
From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/examples/etc make.conf
Message-ID: <20020802150453.GA68046@sunbay.com>
References: <20020802114413.GA9853@sunbay.com> <200208021230.g72CUqRZ039243@grimreaper.grondar.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200208021230.g72CUqRZ039243@grimreaper.grondar.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 01:30:52PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
> [ excessive quoting snipped ]
>=20
> > Yes, so what?  NOUUCP read: (bool) Set to not build uucp(1) related pro=
gram=3D
> > s.
>=20
> rmail is a part of sendmail.
>=20
OK.

> NOUUCP was of use to remove an entire subsystem, but to have a global
> option to remove a single binary makes no sense. NOUUCP really meant
> NORMAIL, and as such was badly named and a poor precedent (are we going
> to have NOCAT next?)
>=20
OK.

> If rmail really needs removing, then we need to properly remove it from
> base and let UUCP users use ports-sendmail.
>=20
OK.

> Can we please not discuss to death one binary applet?
>=20
Just hard days here.  :-)


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov		Sysadmin and DBA,
ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software AG,
ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251	Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org	The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com	Enabling The Information Age

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9Sp+VUkv4P6juNwoRAsHQAJ9oJQDViumVuxDNlEdPGWthBMR72QCdFxNv
AfZLtiqd7aTfnxbWuqmgWjA=
=ArUz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message