From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 10 21:10:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9C116A41F for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:10:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDA643D8D for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:10:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB4E1A3C2A; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:10:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A21CB512CE; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:10:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:10:27 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: David Gerard Message-ID: <20051210211027.GA80550@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051210172500.58401.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <439B17CA.30309@thingy.apana.org.au> <20051210201601.GB79654@xor.obsecurity.org> <439B4270.7040404@thingy.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AhhlLboLdkugWU4S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <439B4270.7040404@thingy.apana.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd Theme Song X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:10:41 -0000 --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 09:02:40PM +0000, David Gerard wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > The thing you have to remember about Denial is that the ONLY THING he > > cares about in an OS is how fast it can route network packets. The > > major improvements in other areas of FreeBSD are of absolutely no > > interest to him, therefore the whole thing is a waste of time. >=20 >=20 > Huh. But I found 5.x vastly annoying in all sorts of little ways when > 4.x seemed to Just Work. I realise this is entirely subjective, but it > was noticeable. Fair enough. I notice that you don't troll about it, so that's fine :) > > But anyway, FreeBSD 6.0 is hugely superior to 5.4 and 4.11 in > > filesystem performance. I have been measuring this carefully for the > > past couple of months and hope to have the paper out soon. >=20 >=20 > And wifi? Considering mine's the household server and I want to make it > all wifi to get rid of the damn cat5 everywhere, I really should get to > it ;-) I don't use this, but 6.0 is probably the way to go there too since there were architectural improvements that could not be merged back to 5.x. Kris --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDm0RDWry0BWjoQKURAmvRAKCh6oaosSAfIVc9HENfEzA8psHxowCfdSAy Nnc8KcfAyOoZTRFbAQXxB44= =t+SI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--