From owner-freebsd-alpha Sat Dec 22 2:53:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED2237B416; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 02:53:17 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id fBMArF711889; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:53:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely9.cicely.de) Received: from mail.cicely.de (cicely20.cicely.de [10.1.1.22]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id fBMArUtx099525; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:53:31 +0100 (CET)?g (envelope-from ticso@cicely9.cicely.de) Received: from cicely9.cicely.de (cicely9.cicely.de [10.1.7.11]) by mail.cicely.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id fBMArTW24228; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:53:30 +0100 (CET) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely9.cicely.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fBMArTp13093; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:53:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:53:29 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Wilko Bulte Cc: Mike Smith , Christian Weisgerber , freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG, msmith@mass.dis.org Subject: Re: PC164: xl0 sensitive to slot Message-ID: <20011222105328.GC3406@cicely9.cicely.de> References: <200112220352.fBM3qQb06137@mass.dis.org> <20011222105941.C3024@freebie.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011222105941.C3024@freebie.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely9.cicely.de 5.0-CURRENT alpha Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 10:59:41AM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 07:52:26PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote: > > > My PC164 doesn't appear to be sensitive to where I put the other > > > cards (Tekram DC-390UW, Matrox Mystique, noname '810AE). Is the > > > 3C905 known not to work in 64-bit slots? > > > > This has nothing to do with the 905 working or not working in 64-bit > > slots; it's probably an SRM oddity related to how Digital thought you > > should use the machine. There are all sorts of silly rules encoded > > into SRM about which cards are allowed to go where. If it works > > somewhere, put it there and be happy. > > Does the PC164 have PCI bridge chips? That was always a kiss of death > to some cards, like the 21*4x ethernet cards. All slots are on the same bus. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message