Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:11:32 +1200
From:      Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org>
To:        "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Cc:        Shteryana Shopova <syrinx@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: CFT: new trunk(4)
Message-ID:  <20070416081132.GB75226@heff.fud.org.nz>
In-Reply-To: <20070416071812.V36917@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
References:  <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> <20070411191450.GE815@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <E1Hbs1M-000FWA-7Z@clue.co.za> <20070412210957.GA31864@heff.fud.org.nz> <461FB498.4030407@freebsd.org> <61b573980704150428u5e376d60k6fbe66409493c3bb@mail.gmail.com> <20070416085609.G442@electra.nolink.net> <20070416071812.V36917@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 07:32:58AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Lars Erik Gullerud wrote:
> >I beg to differ. The terms "trunk" and "trunk-style link" are used 
> >throughout IEEE 802.1Q-2005 in examples and illustrations to demonstrate 
> >the concept of carrying multiple tagged vlans over a single link, as 
> >opposed to an "access-style link" carrying a single untagged vlan.
> ...
> 
> That, and in addition, I think, 802.3 (section 3) does not talk about
> 'trunk' at all.
> 
> 
> >I'd tend to prefer bond(4) so Linux users will feel familiar, although 
> >aggr(4) would be equally good.
> 
> I have seen the p4 submits and while I am not worrying about another
> OpenBSD vs. Linux (vs. FreeBSD) bikeshed, what really worries me is
> substituting one non-standard name for another.
> 
> 
> It is called "Link Aggregation" in the IEEE standards, so why would we
> want to call it 'bond'? The term "bonding" is not used in 802.3
> (section 3) either (when related to link aggregation).

I think this is a very good point.

> So if we are about to rename trunk(4) we should do the right thing
> and use something short for "link aggregation" like aggr, laggr (my
> prefered version), linkag, linkaggr or similar.

Well nothings committed yet. laggr is good, linkag rolls off the tounge
better :)


Andrew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070416081132.GB75226>