From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Mar 20 09:47:11 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA20188
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 09:47:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA20183
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 09:47:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gemini.sdsp.mc.xerox.com ([13.231.132.20]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <15081(4)>; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 09:38:00 PST
Received: from gnu.mc.xerox.com (gnu.sdsp.mc.xerox.com) by gemini.sdsp.mc.xerox.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA06765; Wed, 20 Mar 96 12:38:07 EST
Received: by gnu.mc.xerox.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA10379; Wed, 20 Mar 96 12:38:05 EST
Message-Id: <9603201738.AA10379@gnu.mc.xerox.com>
To: Juha Inkari <inkari@snakemail.hut.fi>
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: GNU tar 1.11.2 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 Mar 1996 06:41:15 PST."
             <199603201441.QAA05944@lk-hp-20.hut.fi> 
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 09:38:04 PST
From: "Marty Leisner" <leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


This is probably the wrong media to report general tar problems...
(gnu.utils.bug is much better).

I've done some fixes to 1.11.2 with this regard, 1.11.8 worked fine...

I think tar 1.11.8 is considered beta...

marty