From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 9 07:16:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B150971B; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 07:16:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [188.252.31.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FDEE55; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 07:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r297GL9p072005; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:16:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.6/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id r297GKKB072002; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:16:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:16:20 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lots of network interfaces In-Reply-To: <44y5dx3gx3.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Message-ID: References: <031201ce1b91$841b90d0$8c52b270$@freebsd.org> <44y5dx3gx3.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 09 Mar 2013 08:16:21 +0100 (CET) Cc: dteske@freebsd.org, devin.teske@fisglobal.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 07:16:36 -0000 >> very usable at that point, ifconfig aside). > > The interfaces are a linked list, plus there's a separate kernel dive > for each interface. The list (as opposed to individual interfaces) is i don't care how fast ifconfig displays them, just for how fast things like routing or ipfw rule like "via tun196" would work. if it is hashed somehow - fine. if not - very bad.