From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 13 11:11:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE4516A4CE for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 11:11:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.calyx.net (mail2.calyx.net [216.82.161.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF5E43D2D for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 11:11:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from btx@mojo.calyx.net) Received: (qmail 2352 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2003 19:11:28 -0000 Received: from mojo.calyx.com (HELO mojo.calyx.net) (216.82.160.22) by mail2.calyx.net with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Dec 2003 19:11:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 24951 invoked by uid 1011); 13 Dec 2003 19:10:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 14:10:01 -0500 From: Brian Costello To: Dan Strick Message-ID: <20031213191001.GA7927@mojo.calyx.net> References: <200312121850.hBCIoAYP000503@mist.nodomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312121850.hBCIoAYP000503@mist.nodomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.x-RELEASE on the intel 875 or 865-series chipsets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 19:11:32 -0000 Dan: Thank you very much for your response! I of course checked hardware.txt before posting, but didn't see a single mention on either the 5.x or 4.x release sections, but figured it was just an oversight as you pointed out - the 875 & 865 seemed to be far too be far too popular a chipset to be fully ignored by FreeBSD, but I of course couldn't say for sure... and I had lots of trouble finding any mention of i865 and i875 on ANY FreeBSD mailing list. Also, thanks for the terminology correction :) "Legacy mode" sounds a bit better than "some sort of compatibility mode" :) Anyway, I'll be installing FreeBSD 4.9 on my new systems... I use 4.8 currently, but from my FreeBSD experience, when FreeBSD doesn't natively support something, there are USUALLY problems in the "compatibility" or "legacy" mode. Might as well start with the latest and move to a dev 5.x if that doesn't work. I'll follow up to the list if I can get it to work. Thanks again! Brian Costello btx@calyx.net > > The "some sort of compatibility" mode is called "legacy" mode. You set it > in the main BIOS. In this mode, the 875/865 series chipsets (actually the > ICH5 chip) make the SATA disks appear to be on one of the channels of the > traditional motherboard ATA controller and they probably work fine in this > mode with almost any OS that understands traditional motherboard ATA. > There may be some confusion over the ATA cable type, but as long as the > driver configures the drives for some sort of DMA, they will do SATA150. > > The Intel 875/865 (ICH5) SATA controller works in native (non-legacy) > mode beginning with FreeBSD 4.9 and 5.x. The 4.9 driver does not > understand much about SATA but it seems to work quite well enough. > This controller also seemed to work correctly in native mode under 5.1. > The 5.x driver is in flux at the moment. It seems to have lots of > difficulty with this particular SATA controller. I don't know how > seriously the bugs are viewed by the FreeBSD release engineering team > (or if the bugs will be fixed in 5.2). > > Note that the HARDWARE.TXT files in FreeBSD releases still do not claim > any particular support for Intel 875/865 (ICH5) ATA controllers. > I don't know if this is policy or an oversight. > > Dan Strick > strick@covad.net > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"