From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 16 15:25:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD76A16A41F for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:25:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBADE43D4C for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:25:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 8424 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Dec 2005 15:25:07 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Xo7gdHI46GePJeRgwGJEvc3bjfkls6BLbdGdCZOV++ko1PZPPPzMJUKbwLFXvqpWR5ApHkN1VZmIujybvi2ntUZZ1x+jHeNLvijD1pE33d0xPKedJYGZwCrXYBjiQC72SXl+3eTxHcv6Qzt4ZKtnlwwO7NJ5YjzxuMNO4tn9lhM= ; Message-ID: <20051216152507.8422.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:25:07 PST Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:25:07 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Cezar Fistik , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1808066969.20051214224200@arax.md> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Re[4]: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd ThemeSong) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:25:10 -0000 --- Cezar Fistik wrote: > Hello all, > > > Or maybe FreeBSD just sucks wind? I promise > you > > that no machine known to man can pass 150Mb/s > and > > be 99% idle. Get a god-damned clue for pete's > > sake. All polling does is screw up accounting > so > > the timings are wrong. At best there's a > marginal > > difference in performance. You still have to > > process the packets. > > > Lets see, this "Test" would mean that his box > > could handle 100 x 150Mb/s, or 15Gb/s. Thats > > quite a little router you have there! lol. > > > > I have to recognize that I didn't follow the > thread very carefuly and > I propbably missed some posts. I just wanted to > say that when using > freebsd as a pure router using intel cards, > polling realy helps. I've > noticed 10-20% CPU utilization decrease with > polling enabled. Second, I > didn't mean 150Megabytes/sec, rather > Megabits/sec. Third the actual > CPU load is ranging from 0-4% (according to > top), but with an average > of 1%. And finally I just did a test and > enabled polling on that box. > The CPU idle state immediately dropped to 88% > while interrupts > increased to 10-12%. > > P.S > Danial, have a look at this > http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/M/Mbps.html With all due respect, you haven't a clue. Do you know math? 99% idle implies 1% utilization. So 150 Mega Bits per second X 100 is 15gigaBITS per seconds is the capacity of your system, using match. Which is stupid. Anyone who thinks that is accurate is just plain stupid. THE MEASUREMENTS DON'T WORK WITH POLLING ENABLED. Are you able to understand that? DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com