From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Sun Jan 5 18:03:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546651E10FF; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 18:03:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chmeeedalf@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yb1-xb44.google.com (mail-yb1-xb44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47rRNH1B4cz4Ym5; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 18:03:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chmeeedalf@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yb1-xb44.google.com with SMTP id x14so21129589ybr.4; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 10:03:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qrOr6c0F4ZIsNJGSW4R5CT1UOeznIPyhvJxU1GPr/iQ=; b=FTTS0GCoC4iA/CFcH9OJ1ZpEzpkTIq5VRP045Dd6bq+uqcdT+d3zRDhQDCHdOxAA0n dbK5m8iJrMCIrF6L2zHwQNyu2g54n+EX/TB3ELsbXOU1pAsKMlys/BvL+LTT+l192kF5 d9AUGlyrJ2CrQDBT7jottgX4wXWq79xmhE6kjhiNpnywWW0I5UDGvaWFS5PGpdWk7TQ1 Ctn8cMgl5S9DGKrosIlKPQJcA12GNveRGKiMjKOq2USKI9iOUr2XAhKnR35FYpy0SuYL 1MBMKFXWuzXS5mz3xQyFDQNhnaGBTNNT+c3nnxqfMnakLuQPaIYm3IfWs0uf9U92Bfjm fYeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qrOr6c0F4ZIsNJGSW4R5CT1UOeznIPyhvJxU1GPr/iQ=; b=I8v630zmBz6OSFEr4O32leloP3Cz+/2CKVzzCZQaMWYYJzZOuNlOHlb7KfTGBUcPO6 10qrPh+LpEjuGuJXzDa98Pz3rdBOu9GTDUSiudZnrM8CsLOLUqIoCiD4dF47eqSRKUYY 3tIw1Vt2kygMJbSq+C2liMhK/aeIoVWhupQzKxPfKQCAcwrV6mJdu0zhO2du1MA1R/WF 1WJm4oJs8fdhvzFlIlNxR9vgnTk666gZ6Z6Qkrg1bcNS1GjmVWxo8cOBv8GZdP49NiN6 B3XjDtUNnKWIcPiWUNcul5JT6Mo32qPDsFyjL8SvNGkpn9eYRPLeUwdsyxkRZ8pFBJ8a O1hA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXnegUYh32ZgItZ8DG45KYdyHv2v3EdSJybYnEDJ0SnDF8DjGyZ GlIOI0vdGxmbDOA5/Roqhy3P6ODF X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzodVc5MDNCCY54E++LjO97cinOgULEpxNz8XLrM9/VnLM6GTk0//ZNUq5YJNZ9yUi3L3dxhg== X-Received: by 2002:a25:e616:: with SMTP id d22mr71978301ybh.220.1578247437662; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 10:03:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from titan.knownspace (173-19-125-130.client.mchsi.com. [173.19.125.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l22sm27029583ywl.54.2020.01.05.10.03.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 05 Jan 2020 10:03:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 12:03:54 -0600 From: Justin Hibbits To: Ed Maste Cc: src-committers , svn-src-all , svn-src-head Subject: Re: svn commit: r356379 - head/share/mk Message-ID: <20200105120354.3b9c1c49@titan.knownspace> In-Reply-To: References: <202001051659.005GxOOa013759@repo.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; powerpc64-portbld-freebsd13.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47rRNH1B4cz4Ym5 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2020 18:03:59 -0000 On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 12:21:53 -0500 Ed Maste wrote: > On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 11:59, Ed Maste wrote: > > > > Author: emaste > > Date: Sun Jan 5 16:59:24 2020 > > New Revision: 356379 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/356379 > > > > Log: > > src.opts.mk: disable BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP on mips64* > > I should probably make this the case for all of mips* and sparc64. > Using a decade-old binutils with a contemporary compiler (either Clang > or GCC) isn't likely to be a combination used by anyone else and it's > not going to be a good use of our time investigating and addressing > any issues that arise. powerpc and powerpcspe still use in-tree binutils (or external binutils... but in-tree works well enough, until we start adding ifuncs), until such a time that lld is fully functional. - Justin