Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 01:59:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-10 -> FreeBSD-9.9 ? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110260155440.4671@ai.fobar.qr> In-Reply-To: <20111025215837.B6AA615DE789@drugs.dv.isc.org> References: <CAJ-Vmom27Z3pkbVyFhsmdt60KDSsxNmT4jLa=dQJrdUGLUNqoA@mail.gmail.com> <20111024230623.GB14274@dragon.NUXI.org> <201110250918.28709.hselasky@c2i.net> <20111025184523.GC47524@dragon.NUXI.org> <20111025215837.B6AA615DE789@drugs.dv.isc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Ok, so what's the minimum versions of the auto* and libtoo* that are
> fixed so I can ship BIND9 w/o freebsd1*) in configure? If I need to
> bump the tool versions I want to do it once.
libtool in ports is fixed; the changes are in the SCM upstream already
but not in any released version yet as much as I know. You will
release often enough so that your software will have it fixed sooner
than a lot of the thousands others ... If you want further advise,
ask on ports@
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1110260155440.4671>