From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jul 11 21:48:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA03245 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 21:48:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.144.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA03238 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 21:48:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA26796; Sat, 11 Jul 1998 21:48:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 1998 21:48:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Max Euston cc: "'FreeBSD Questions'" Subject: Re: MX record for all hosts in a domain In-Reply-To: <01BDAB27.8AA9CCE0.meuston@jmrodgers.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, Max Euston wrote: > My read of RFC-1033 says: > > FOO.COM. MX 10 RELAY.CS.NET. > *.FOO.COM. MX 20 RELAY.CS.NET. ^ I assume you're abbreviating things since this isn't valid syntax. > should send mail for user@foo.com _AND_ user@host.foo.com to relay.cs.net? Should, yes. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message