Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 21:15:41 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND qustionS Message-ID: <87y929dg36.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> In-Reply-To: <20030417005140.GA99929@tao.thought.org> (Gary D. Kline's message of "Wed, 16 Apr 2003 17:51:40 -0700") References: <20030417005140.GA99929@tao.thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2003-04-17T00:51:40Z, Gary D Kline <kline@thought.org> writes: > After upgrading to BIND-9.2.2, I bumped into the following output message > that I don't understand. Run `rndc-confgen' to generate the key (and a reasonable rndc.conf to go with it). > Also, do any of you DNS/BIND wizrds understand the last output? Yes. named could open a secure key to use to authenticate control commands, so it's not listening on a port to accept them. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+ng5N5sRg+Y0CpvERAk1NAJwInxQlj6j3A3mseOT1VrkEzhcQ6gCcCep5 kiB5zIFYKFnq93/FXch80Qk= =HI5c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87y929dg36.fsf>