From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Jan 18 14:50:32 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id OAA03416 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 18 Jan 1995 14:50:32 -0800
Received: from desiree.teleport.com (desiree.teleport.com [192.108.254.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA03406 for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 1995 14:50:30 -0800
From: bmk@dtr.com
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by desiree.teleport.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with UUCP id OAA07463 for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 18 Jan 1995 14:50:18 -0800
Received: (from bmk@localhost) by dtr.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id OAA02697 for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 18 Jan 1995 14:45:21 -0800
Message-Id: <199501182245.OAA02697@dtr.com>
Subject: Re: Reboots under 2.0-SNAP pppd (once again).
To: questions@FreeBSD.org
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 1995 14:45:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <199501181502.HAA01993@dtr.com> from "bmk@dtr.com" at Jan 18, 95 07:02:26 am
Reply-To: bmk@dtr.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 682       
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


> > > I just upgraded my system to the latest snapshot on wcarchive.  It seems
> > > now that some bugs may have crept back into the pppd code.

> > This is weird!  Why is nobody else reporting this?  I'll look into it
> > as best I can..

> I did some additional experimentation with it this morning.  Here's what
> I did:

[snip]

It looks like it's not fixed after all.  It rebooted about 35 minutes
into my testing this morning.

Since nobody else seems to be having this problem, it's hard to call
this a bug.  I'm going to do some additional digging and see what I
unearth.

P.S.: Sorry for previously xposting this between questions and bugs... I
should have known better.