From owner-freebsd-doc Sat Oct 10 16:17:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA13956 for freebsd-doc-outgoing; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 16:17:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA13951 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 16:17:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA21525; Sat, 10 Oct 1998 16:16:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Sue Blake cc: Eivind Eklund , Justin Clift , freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG, kpielorz@tdx.co.uk Subject: Re: *very* important addition to the installation instructions In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 11 Oct 1998 07:40:52 +1000." <19981011074052.21400@welearn.com.au> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 16:16:50 -0700 Message-ID: <21521.908061410@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > If they were to find something that has become an undocumented > "technical fix" in a later version, we must assume they will find their > way to freebsd-questions and be treated kindly there by those with good > memories. I see nowhere here any stipulation against putting a note in the FAQ or handbook, appropriately marked as applicable to FreeBSD 2.2.7 and earlier releases. I suggest the FAQ as the best vehicle for this, and sending your contribution to faq@freebsd.org as diffs to the existing FAQ (which is readily cvsup/ftp/CTMable) is far more likely to resolve this problem expediently than any other course of action I could think of. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message