From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 19 21:43:44 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DAF16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:43:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F58043D2D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:43:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com)
Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 77so200310rnl
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.164.57 with SMTP id m57mr534053rne;
        Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <790a9fff0408191443e46a3ed@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:43:38 -0500
From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20040819213335.GA2509@gicco.homeip.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <20040819192425.GA1935@gicco.homeip.net>
	<20040819213335.GA2509@gicco.homeip.net>
Subject: Re: releng_5
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:43:44 -0000

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 23:33:35 +0200, Hanspeter Roth <hampi@rootshell.be> wrote:
> What do the *_BP tags mean?
> 
Branch Point