From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 19 10:53:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A9BA8AB for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AA40D8B for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tom.home (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2JArYId072974 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:53:35 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 kib.kiev.ua t2JArYId072974 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t2JArYAT072973; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:53:34 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:53:34 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Ivan Radovanovic Subject: Re: kevent behavior Message-ID: <20150319105334.GB2379@kib.kiev.ua> References: <550A6DA2.1070004@gmail.com> <20150319100151.GY2379@kib.kiev.ua> <550AA99C.5060102@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <550AA99C.5060102@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on tom.home Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:53:40 -0000 On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:49:00AM +0100, Ivan Radovanovic wrote: > So if I understand you correctly close(kfd) would simply block because > kevent on same kqueue descriptor is in progress? Yes, this is my reading of the code.