From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 3 22:18:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE5D106566B for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:18:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85FB8FC12 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so152701wib.13 for ; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:18:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8VOjhc1CqhKHEDR9Vp8t5h6OmUUnGZNxwDjBNyMRxZ8=; b=xDKChSXOeQK60b1cqQF7ohHJ1HUv+H7EkzoxKL7e96JMOni3/WzfGL/2eeMXmYQzPg At8Fx/a3IBipG9f6+qF72OVm2O6w8mPLiVccOmiAgKbbIctp3nXIgIUCwnMEAD/w2tXY oya96aj5JHTJ2Dmx8wOVwskwk3yMpgS/C00IGPO7/87ZV+9kCkeRXIno/LGRfXtik+o3 RM7/LO3QczuRLK8J3Wv9lanLuMjwCrZ9J7VnTxHQUgZLmf+LDDn95g5geP3TY7BVxc6Z X4C9jnqaTbXT4if+wrE91Uz515QpWFGbphSK7vdQYYVTyR+LfrcHp2jSBjtNN/C5FP+e Am/g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.92.71 with SMTP id ck7mr40612792wib.21.1333491506624; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.54.207 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:18:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120329072054.GA45082@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20120403074954.GA19241@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:18:26 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Beeblebrox Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lagg problems on diskless client X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:18:28 -0000 Does a 'dikless' server run eunichs? Sorry. I really should resist this kind of carp. Almost as bad as back when I sent a note to a customer about a requirement to adjust our 'peeing' policy. (And the spell checker won't catch that one.) On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Beeblebrox wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Beeblebrox wrote: >> > Slightly different point of view: Under this scenario of dikless clien= ts >> > having dual NICs would CRAP be a choice to consider? From what I have >> read >> Typo or editorial comment^^^^^^ =A0-) >> > it can offer loadbalancing but as I understand it's not really applica= ble >> > to diskless node situations? >> -- >> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer >> E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com >> > > That's hilarious. It's a typo. Correction C-A-R-P. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com