Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 12:08:23 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> To: David DEMELIER <demelier.david@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: OPTIONS Message-ID: <4CA85617.7060503@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimLqUaZMyDs-mhc-cQbASU%2B_1XqRjd=2=N%2BVSsR@mail.gmail.com> References: <4C93AA31.5080202@DataIX.net> <AANLkTik%2B1rvY4ZYgzHRjaX8PBfD1UqNCNeadHqg3KBfo@mail.gmail.com> <20100918223933.GB85995@dragon.NUXI.org> <AANLkTi=vPKpaPL9L=pQN9EdWdEN3sf1pos6uGtJU7ybV@mail.gmail.com> <20101002002605.GA8018@dragon.NUXI.org> <AANLkTinkasFFQ8ssbTSdbYUS%2BJ-tYMc1U3w9rkUCk9Gd@mail.gmail.com> <4CA844E5.7060303@infracaninophile.co.uk> <AANLkTimLqUaZMyDs-mhc-cQbASU%2B_1XqRjd=2=N%2BVSsR@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/10/2010 11:45, David DEMELIER wrote: > 2010/10/3 Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>: > I don't want something complex, checkbox, textbox, radiobuttons is enough. Textbox is _very_ complex. Think of all the code you'd have to add to ports to check what was entered by the user. At the very least you have to verify that whatever was provided is valid. For the feature not to become annoying you'd have to be a lot more fuzzy and complex, though. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CA85617.7060503>