From owner-freebsd-bugs  Thu Mar 23 02:25:27 1995
Return-Path: bugs-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA07288 for bugs-outgoing; Thu, 23 Mar 1995 02:25:27 -0800
Received: from relay.philips.nl (relay.philips.nl [130.144.65.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA07282; Thu, 23 Mar 1995 02:25:23 -0800
Received: from muxgw1.ms.philips.nl ([130.144.90.6]) by relay.philips.nl (8.6.9/8.6.9-950103) with SMTP id LAA02414; Thu, 23 Mar 1995 11:22:52 +0100
Received: by muxgw1.ms.philips.nl (5.57/Ultrix2.4-C)
	id AA22566; Thu, 23 Mar 95 11:06:20 +0200
Received: by mmra1.ms.philips.nl (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA21793; Thu, 23 Mar 95 11:21:22 +0100
From: gvrooij@mmra1.ms.philips.nl (Guido van Rooij)
Message-Id: <9503231021.AA21793@mmra1.ms.philips.nl>
Subject: Re: Changed information for PR kern/267
To: davidg@freefall.cdrom.com (David Greenman)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 1995 11:21:21 +0100 (MET)
Cc: hsu@clinet.fi, davidg@freefall.cdrom.com, freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com
In-Reply-To: <199503230946.BAA06235@freefall.cdrom.com> from "David Greenman" at Mar 23, 95 01:46:43 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 412       
Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> This occurred because Heikki has options DIAGNOSTIC in his kernel. The
> diagnostic message itself is bogus, however, as the condition of having
> more dirty blocks at that point is both possible and likely since the
> vnode isn't locked. I've removed the message.
> 

But what about his comments that when it happens, the machine seems to hang
for a few seconds? (or am I mixing up 2 reports now?)

-Guido