From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 20 13:34:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762E816A4BF for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandvine.com (sandvine.com [199.243.201.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A783B43FF9 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:34:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ddolson@sandvine.com) Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:34:16 -0400 Message-ID: From: Dave Dolson To: "'hackers@freebsd.org'" Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 16:34:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: spltty / tty_imask question X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 20:34:20 -0000 A quick FreeBSD 4.7 kernel question: Is tty_imask supposed to have bits set for all sio devices? I.e., should bits 3 and 4 be set to indicate IRQ3 and IRQ4? I noticed by gdb of a running system that bit 4 was set, but not bit 3. We're seeing a panic due to re-acquiring COM_LOCK, and I was wondering if this was the problem. Thanks, David Dolson (ddolson@sandvine.com, www.sandvine.com)