Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:27:30 +0300
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
To:        Ian FREISLICH <if@hetzner.co.za>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] libreadline buildworld breakage.
Message-ID:  <20041021102730.GB47641@ip.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <E1CKZzM-000PSg-00@hetzner.co.za>
References:  <20041021100440.GA69052@nagual.pp.ru> <E1CKZzM-000PSg-00@hetzner.co.za>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 12:16:08PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 01:33:07PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > > It is old one. New one should be 1.1.1.9, without any $FreeBSD$ tag
> > > Can you compare "cvs co contrib_libreadline" with your contrib/librea=
dline=20
> > > contents?
> >=20
> > I just check by cvsupping from another machine, all looks right:
> >=20
> > ...
> > Edit src/contrib/libreadline/complete.c
> >   Add delta 1.1.1.9 2004.10.18.07.02.39 ache
> > ...
>=20
> I was going to ask in the other mail if some repo surgery had taken
> place.  The last time this happened to me, someone had perpetrated
> a repo surgury and something about when I and the mirror synced
> broke things in a way that screwed me (and I think one or two others)
> over.
>=20
Yes, the repo-surgery was done some time ago, and it looks like you
were hit by it.

> [brane-dead] /usr/src/contrib # diff -ud ~ianf/complete.c,v /home/ncvs/sr=
c/contrib/libreadline/complete.c,v=20
> --- /home/ianf/complete.c,v     Mon Oct 18 09:02:43 2004
> +++ /home/ncvs/src/contrib/libreadline/complete.c,v     Mon Oct 18 09:02:=
43 2004
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>  head   1.9;
> +branch 1.1.1;
>  access;
>  symbols
>         v5_0:1.1.1.9
>=20
> This is the diff of the ,v file.  The one in ~ianf was moved out
> of CVSROOT after a cvsup that changed nothing.  An immediate
> subsequent cvsup produced a ,v file with this difference.
>=20
This explains it.  The surgery returned this file on a vendor branch,
adding this "branch 1.1.1;" line to an RCS file.  Are you by chance
ALWAYS using the -s option to cvsup(1)?


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBd48SqRfpzJluFF4RAk/SAJ0fpdlR86fRHh20OuK8MfDek8WVcgCeLtLF
zltQJxvqyH1fJQ6BIvrgPBk=
=LdGD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041021102730.GB47641>