From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 16:43:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D7E106567C; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao104.cox.net (eastrmmtao104.cox.net [68.230.240.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459E88FC26; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:43:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080314164336.MVFH24940.eastrmmtao104.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net>; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:43:36 -0400 Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id 14bS1Z00D4iy4EG0000000; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:35:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:45:07 -0500 To: "Joe Marcus Clarke" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200803141450.m2EEo2eU022317@freefall.freebsd.org> <47DAA0A7.3040308@freebsd.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <47DAA0A7.3040308@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.26 (Linux) Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/121670: [PATCH] Update converters/libiconv to 1.12 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:43:37 -0000 On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:58:31 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> The following reply was made to PR ports/121670; it has been noted by >> GNATS. >> From: Pav Lucistnik >> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, delphij@FreeBSD.org >> Cc: Subject: Re: ports/121670: [PATCH] Update converters/libiconv to >> 1.12 >> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:43:59 +0100 >> Licensing framework is certainly something we will need. Currently >> we're >> looking for volunteers to work on it, so... >> Then we will need to inspect every file in every of 18,000+ ports. >> IMHO we could update libiconv now and deal with licensing issues as >> they >> are discovered, but I am not a lawyer. > > I'm okay with that. This would not be the first GPLv3 port in the tree > (see GCC 4.3). If someone complains that their binary links to a GPLv3 > library, we can evaluate how to proceed with that. Well, the GCC 4.3 is a bit different with libiconv. Our ports don't (or most?) use GCC 4.3 by default. It's user's decision, not by us. Cheers, Mezz > Joe -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org