From owner-cvs-all Mon Jul 16 3:43: 4 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from kalaid.f2f.com.ua (kalaid.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEC537B405; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 03:42:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from Mail-In.Net (borey.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.24]) by kalaid.f2f.com.ua (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f6GAisj70638; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:44:54 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from vega.vega.com (root@[212.35.189.143]) by Mail-In.Net (8.11.3/8.H.Z) with ESMTP id f6GAhdu16747; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:43:40 +0300 (EEST) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vega.vega.com (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6GAgYD47537; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:42:34 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3B52C52C.C59D70C2@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:42:53 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: dd@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Another immediate MFC that isn't really necessary [was: cvs References: <200107131551.f6DFpBu23227@freefall.freebsd.org> <3B4F1FCD.7F2D4842@FreeBSD.org> <20010713120140Q.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan Hubbard wrote: > As much as I admire the spirit in which this was intended, I'm not > sure you should be administering public spankings like this. Sorry if it was too boring... > Some changes are so trivial and obvious as to make an immediate MFC > perfectly reasonable so as not to forget it, and the whole MFC after > thing is a new mechanism which people, including me, are not > necessarily inclined to trust yet. What should I do to increase its trustworthiness? I would really happy to do so. -Maxim > This has always been up to an > individual committer's best judgement except during freezes or other > pending-release cycles and it's not for you to judge someone else's > actions here, OK? If someone *breaks* -stable then that's clearly > another matter and I don't see that as being the case here. > > - Jordan > > From: Maxim Sobolev > Subject: Another immediate MFC that isn't really necessary [was: cvs commit: src/libexec/talkd announce.c] > Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:20:29 +0300 > > > Dima Dorfman wrote: > > > > > dd 2001/07/13 08:51:10 PDT > > > > > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > > > libexec/talkd announce.c > > > Log: > > > MFC 1.13: print month number correctly. > > > > People, please stop doing immediate MFCs of non-essential changes! > > > > -Maxim > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message