From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 3 07:47:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91C994E3 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x244.google.com (mail-ie0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::244]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC5B677 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f196.google.com with SMTP id rd18so3050760iec.3 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 23:47:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dzBZGZTxw0RRRtsrWuhiURfsQVbY0iW0Hd4eJ5EI20E=; b=RPq6ww2RprrbT7bz6T80fO0B/tThuNX6BFEVt9GlPaCZt2j/czB+1J+mVjtb4lIKyW TkgaAsEqLVYLO+nPewDu8T3QCqR4Bw2lyKM8qtqvlyFUyJ8xSB3IQ8qXIifSdqLc9CH7 njvtpnnb2Zf7XhTOykGmdAitFuiniy68h5eItdhvBY3p8IYsSu6mcIbJP/5yXC4rTRI1 kuBlijB0LlXABMyJwlL65iCZ/6EgMwSdRGV+p6UqIYstTPE3L/4lF704eRZM9ziqovdj q9Tv83b9J8HjIfsKeMDvK/hmOKpXdjvNtrVPBcutTfLQY5GGQbblfJtonMgN9kV+KgLR /BuA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.115.102 with SMTP id jn6mr20209084igb.10.1393832858905; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 23:47:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.159.132 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 23:47:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 01:47:38 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: pyhon33 still listed as vulnerable From: JEREMY COX To: freebsd-python@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 07:47:39 -0000 Sorry if I wasn't more clear, my ports tree was updated a few minutes before I wrote the email, from March 3 @ 0700 UTC... and the patch for CVE-2014-1912 was already in /usr/ports/lang/python33/files... otherwise I never would have updated the port! I always verify changes with the FreeBSD svn website first. Even after the ports tree was updated, and the port was updated, pkg audit still lists python33-3.3.3_3 as vulnerable, when the CVE lists the vulnerability applicable only to python33 <= 3.3.3_2.