Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:18:29 +0200
From:      Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Andrew Reilly <areilly@bigpond.net.au>
Cc:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/118808: Fix to build ports/lang/drscheme on FreeBSD-7.0
Message-ID:  <1213845509.9714.5.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20080619031615.GA86175@duncan.reilly.home>
References:  <200806190250.m5J2ot0W097615@freefall.freebsd.org> <20080619031615.GA86175@duncan.reilly.home>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-2fkWkH0zTwx6Ozj7SVrr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Andrew Reilly p=ED=B9e v =E8t 19. 06. 2008 v 13:16 +1000:
> Hi Pav,
>=20
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 02:50:55AM +0000, pav@FreeBSD.org wrote:
> > Synopsis: Fix to build ports/lang/drscheme on FreeBSD-7.0
> >=20
> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> > State-Changed-By: pav
> > State-Changed-When: Thu Jun 19 02:50:30 UTC 2008
> > State-Changed-Why:=20
> > Committed, thanks!
> >=20
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D118808
>=20
> I'm not sure that these patches are still necessary.  As far as
> I know, they've been accepted up-stream at least for version
> 372.

The port is still at 370. If you want to update the port, that would be
nice.

> Regarding 4.0, which has just been relased, I sent a new port
> for consideration to jkoshy a couple of days ago, but hadn't
> noticed that he's not the official maintainer any more.  Should
> I attach it to a send-pr, or send it to someone particular
> instead?  I opted to make it a new port (called plt-scheme,
> rather than drscheme) because it is not backwards compatible
> in some ways, and because the version number got smaller
> 4.0, rather than 400, and because that's what the PLT group
> themselves seem to be calling it, now.

send-pr sounds good.

--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Sun couldn't care less about Linux other than it now being necessary in
order to be buzzword compliant. -- Al Dente

--=-2fkWkH0zTwx6Ozj7SVrr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEABECAAYFAkhZ0AUACgkQntdYP8FOsoKZkgCeNTY5P7qujM3v8LcUIapUSwBP
rrcAoI8i+9OKnMoXcS3OpWZJ9pJW/tps
=FgLA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-2fkWkH0zTwx6Ozj7SVrr--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1213845509.9714.5.camel>