From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Feb 7 15:59:39 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7153624F717 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48Dg3b2SN9z3D3l for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5254524F716; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510E524F715 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Dg3b1PJ4z3D3k for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B5597007 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 017Fxdvp082952 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:59:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 017FxdZE082951 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:59:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 243957] emulators/i386-wine{-devel}: broken on CURRENT Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 15:59:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: salvadore@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 15:59:39 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243957 --- Comment #5 from Lorenzo Salvadore --- (In reply to Alex S from comment #4) What's specific to wine is that wine is broken on CURRENT. If a wine user wants to report that wine is broken on CURRENT, s/he might be tempted to open a PR about wine, although, as you observed, the problem is = more general. The role of this PR is to point to the general PR, in a similar ma= nner as what is usually done with complex exp-runs. Other ports broken for the same reason should, in my opinion, have similar = PRs that point to the general PR. Moreover, it is indeed likely that the general problem will be solved witho= ut modifications to the wine ports and that those ports will then work again untouched, but the opposite is not impossible: it is not impossible that wi= ne ports will need to change to integrate with the general solution. That said, if bugzilla triagers or committers agree with you and want to cl= ose this PR, I will not object. I am only trying to adopt the best strategy to = help people find existing bugs and understand the relations between them. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=