From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Nov 7 18:22:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3509946666F for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 18:22:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CT5Fg2Xmyz3Q0N for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 18:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([70.67.229.168]) by shaw.ca with ESMTPA id bSqqk17Gx34axbSqrkIkXl; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 11:22:13 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=LvQsdlRc c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=5fa6e5d5 a=7AlCcx2GqMg+lh9P3BclKA==:117 a=7AlCcx2GqMg+lh9P3BclKA==:17 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=nNwsprhYR40A:10 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=s1G7sxBSAAAA:20 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=EkcXrb_YAAAA:8 a=cNTiZfDz_XcFpwAL0zcA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 a=LK5xJRSDVpKd5WXXoEvA:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [IPv6:fc00:1:1:1::5b]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C69E4207; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 10:22:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 0A7IMBfZ063891; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 10:22:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Message-Id: <202011071822.0A7IMBfZ063891@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.7.1 Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: Franco Fichtner cc: Cy Schubert , Peter Czanik , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: In-reply-to: References: <202011071539.0A7FdMmj052814@slippy.cwsent.com> <6E6B60B0-DE59-4F2B-B612-07F7B505AF58@lastsummer.de> <202011071725.0A7HP9rm003300@slippy.cwsent.com> Comments: In-reply-to Franco Fichtner message dated "Sat, 07 Nov 2020 18:46:40 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2020 10:22:11 -0800 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfCPKt+y6lfuo7GZrCwXvmFVzMBsuaJE81zYNVa09JsYJwHqECpHsYMYHS+ftqBTqJ35398T9cbkENAK8xeftTEnW2fK0ycq3C1zALn1z9+oKFaeex+j9 uTAvCdCPMtUyhCf0hZifkXfDzdWtvmpW1q4VMM+l5UDtKFr+ImfmPSzbMozw9xy5BkNTZBuJcg+GRvqjWLIcecKBZAaWGPXZcRGtIH86PUMqsb/+IWgU69dw uF9ECoCPpzR0HssPcI8oqcpd0GYlnQP2dmcmwpC33YM= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CT5Fg2Xmyz3Q0N X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cy.schubert@cschubert.com has no SPF policy when checking 64.59.134.13) smtp.mailfrom=cy.schubert@cschubert.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.76 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[70.67.229.168:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6327, ipnet:64.59.128.0/20, country:CA]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[64.59.134.13:from]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_SPACES(0.50)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cschubert.com: no valid DMARC record]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.96)[0.957]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[64.59.134.13:from]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2020 18:22:16 -0000 In message , Franco Fichtne r writes: > > > > On 7. Nov 2020, at 6:25 PM, Cy Schubert wrote: > > > > That's not needed. The proposal is to replace the syslog-ng port with the > > contents of syslog-ng329 and deprecate the others. Those using > > sysutils/syslog-ng will see no change. Those using older versions will need > > > to replace syslog-ngNN with simply syslog-ng. > > Actually I was referring to this: > > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/blob/master/sysutils/syslog-ng329/fi > les/syslog-ng.conf.sample#L1 > > Also a question for Peter. As I said before, sysutils/syslog-ng is 3.29 under a different name because it's the metaport of syslog-ng329. Both are the same. Essentially the guts of syslog-ng329 will replace the hollow shell of syslog-ng. To end users it's all the same. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org NTP: Web: https://nwtime.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.