From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  6 03:04:52 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C694D9B8
 for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Thu,  6 Jun 2013 03:04:52 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from brett@lariat.org)
Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.62.230.51])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF271176
 for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Thu,  6 Jun 2013 03:04:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from Toshi.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net
 [66.119.58.2] (may be forged))
 by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA26612;
 Wed, 5 Jun 2013 20:42:53 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <201306060242.UAA26612@lariat.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 20:42:49 -0600
To: Joe Altman <freebsd@chthonixia.net>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Subject: Re: "injunction" on the use of GA
In-Reply-To: <20130606001815.GA57415@whisperer.chthonixia.net>
References: <51AF2DE4.3090103@gmx.com> <201306051034.20000.jhb@freebsd.org>
 <51AF7E72.8010108@gmx.com>
 <20130606001815.GA57415@whisperer.chthonixia.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
 <freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-chat>,
 <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
 <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 03:04:52 -0000

At 06:18 PM 6/5/2013, Joe Altman wrote:

>Weblog analysis is hard. Google, with its analytics, does it
>well. The project needs that analysis.

For what? To market its expensive product?

The fact is that the project does NOT need this analysis, 
especially at the cost of
visitors' privacy. It sets a horrendous bad example and shows a 
flagrant disregard
for security.

--Brett Glass