From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 19 16:41:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1AB106566B for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 16:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etnapierala@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3348FC12 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 16:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so4660382wgb.31 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:41:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=WXI+hlKi6kDLCETSwoNJYZnJjtQetTynGizWqeUwA6Q=; b=bbZM1jZwc3g+hxoFa0hoQC8evkYp5x8EZRNlIW5dXzfoLSeDNGmJ7JgL/7L/iQcNVV 7zojA0245L3KaOQzCCLE2SOQ/HRYZ0WkJzLlRZ6g+srG+wedxP/XOqILWE0ylHqD40sn YZMHhHav1hhFAuEyeHGisB0g6SVNBn5uSowtTqS/3IourbIIQ15momspQ2qpvpcaQ+ri TirEPkDW7kTXm8qTh+guryF8PO9zYNiWGzJCkWSuvskLMm0wAKS30EGqQWO6y0o2QDle H7umGAXlOHGSh2pMIp0CmycrtZnsJcO52pIODTBB6y0pAFk/ge46PoGm5r3E8sG+nbMD KXFw== Received: by 10.180.7.200 with SMTP id l8mr21783042wia.9.1345394466352; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:41:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.110] (45.81.datacomsa.pl. [195.34.81.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ck9sm34220033wib.2.2012.08.19.09.41.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:41:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= In-Reply-To: <502FD583.9070105@hte.vl.net.ua> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 18:40:59 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <06453437-D034-41C2-8B7F-15B228AD2532@FreeBSD.org> References: <502FD583.9070105@hte.vl.net.ua> To: Pavel Bychykhin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some of ZFS ACLs doesn't work as expected X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 16:41:08 -0000 Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Pavel Bychykhin w dniu 18 sie 2012, o godz. = 19:48: > Dear community! >=20 > After my experiments with ZFS, I concluded, that permissions = "delete_child" and "delete" are ignored. > For the create/update/delete operation a list of "rwxp" = (read_data/write_data/execute/append_data) is fully sufficient. They are not ignored, but yes, write access on a directory is enough to = delete a file. > No need to specify the "delete_child" and "delete" permissions at all, = or I don't understand something? Unless you need them - no, you don't. That's why these bits are not set = in a default case (so called 'trivial ACL', i.e. no ACL set on a file). --=20 If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my = body?