Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:57:38 -0700
From:      David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>
To:        freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: How/why would dev.cpu.0.freq_levels change??!?
Message-ID:  <20080629185738.GG13924@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080629003216.3AA074500E@ptavv.es.net>
References:  <200806281738.40672.jhb@freebsd.org> <20080629003216.3AA074500E@ptavv.es.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--4ndw/alBWmZEhfcZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

OK; I've managed to demonstrate a few things:

* Stopping powerd before the phenomenon occurs does not prevent
  dev.cpu.0.freq_levels from changing, though it does appear to prevent
  dev.cpu.0.freq from changing:
  g1-60(6.3-S)[1] sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq_levels dev.cpu.0.freq
  dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 1200/0 1050/0 900/0 750/0 600/0 450/0 300/0 150/0
  dev.cpu.0.freq: 2400
  g1-60(6.3-S)[2]=20

* As you can see, this can lead to the "interesting" situation that the
  current CPU frequency is higher than the maximum "available."

* The phenomenon is not limited to when I run RELENG_6; in an effort to
  avoid the continuous fan whine, I tried running RELENG_7 for a while,
  and encountered a recurrence rather quickly.  :-(

* I tried firing up the Dell diagnostics; they reported OK for each of
  the CPU & motherboard fans at high speed, but when the diags tried to
  switch to low speed, they reported that the fans only went down (from
  10-11K RPM) to about 7K RPM instead of 5K RPM.  (They reported that
  everything else was working "optimally."  Since their serial port test
  is known to be inadequate -- it makes no attempt to actually use the
  serial port to send or receive data at all -- I don't know how much that
  assessment is actually worth.)

I still don't know what the problems are, but it's apparent that
something outside FreeBSD's control is misbehaving.  Given that, I
suppose it would be unreasonable to expect FreeBSD to compensate
in an attempt to enforce rationality.  :-(

Which still leaves me wondering what type(s) of evasive actions
make sense: I've become rather accustomed to using a laptop with a
1600x1200 screen, and finding another laptop similarly-equipped
(but newer) at a reasoonable price that will run FreeBSD well appears
to be somewhat of a challenge.  I'm open to suggestions.

Maybe I should just see if the local laptop repair place can fix it. :-(

Peace,
david
--=20
David H. Wolfskill				david@catwhisker.org
I submit that "conspiracy" would be an appropriate collective noun for cats.

See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.

--4ndw/alBWmZEhfcZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkhn2yAACgkQmprOCmdXAD3XLgCeOWHRghJTQbXBPc33IIExjb6i
ODMAnjaISSBFwRWGO/fdx0pW6uATwhFP
=Onnt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4ndw/alBWmZEhfcZ--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080629185738.GG13924>