From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 15:44:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819AB16A420 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:44:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from poni1111@yahoo.com) Received: from web51714.mail.yahoo.com (web51714.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8B3A43D48 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:44:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from poni1111@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 37297 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Feb 2006 15:44:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xL4GABOtF4tIjQ2DMhT3hf+8Vs/Ys2DDVc7Szi+izluG5/OW3H+QAjpr72BtyrJVf01OQeTyT6E8hCJIoIdn+0i1crfxdaB+8Gr+iXX8yItFE9I6W1H+djw4W6D9jsfg5B5n8Sn9TLbVe4to7y3uyjOvhr/IUpaMT1a8Fpi5r38= ; Message-ID: <20060226154403.37295.qmail@web51714.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [86.55.10.26] by web51714.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:44:03 PST Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:44:03 -0800 (PST) From: Andrei Iarus To: freebsd In-Reply-To: <44pslcddng.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: arp: XXX is on rl0 but got reply from ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:44:04 -0000 --- Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Andrei Iarus writes: > > > I have read a lot about this error message, but I > have another > > questions: What actually happens when this error > occures? I mean what > > can this error lead to? Is it enough to switch the > specific sysctl > > variable to stop the error (and all it can lead > to)? I dont think so, > > then: Is the blocking of some of those packets the > best solution to > > this problem? (In my case, the problem is because > the 2 NICs are > > connected to the same network through the same > switch). > > Turn off one of these NICs; there's not real reason > to do that > anyway. > The problem is that I really need both NICs up, I need them for NAT, the problem is that I dont really have another posibility to connet the computers behind the FreeBSD machine (that will be connected through the FreeBSD machine to internet) then using the same physical media. Thank you for your advice __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com