From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 12 17: 4:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0490137B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:04:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA92252; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 02:04:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Warner Losh Cc: Daniel Eischen , John Indra , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) References: <3A887FAE.CF15C4BE@vigrid.com> <200102130046.f1D0klW33264@harmony.village.org> <200102130052.f1D0qFW33330@harmony.village.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 13 Feb 2001 02:04:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: Warner Losh's message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:52:15 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Warner Losh writes: > If there's something better than Daniel's solution that doesn't > require a major bump and is compatible with the old libc.so.5 api, > then I'm all for that. I'd love to test it out as well if there's any > desire for that. Yes, there is. Steal _cookie, rename it to _ext or something like that, and make it point to a separate structure that contains _cookie and the mutex. Optionally add a #define to avoid changing libc code that uses _cookie. That's not what Peter intends to commit, though. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message