Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 01:47:29 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett A. Wollman) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Subject: Re: Recent changes to `dump' Message-ID: <199511300047.BAA17196@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <9511291600.AA06049@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett A. Wollman" at Nov 29, 95 11:00:42 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Garrett A. Wollman wrote: > > > What does amanda say to the new dump? > > Well, let's put it this way. I jumped a little to a conclusion. > > Amanda hates the new format. I looked at the part of the code that > parses the dump output, found a reasonable-looking format line, and > compared it to dump's output. I then deleted the word `tape' and all > of my backups worked. Well, yes -- but the "tape" used to be there _before_ the recent changes! The only thing that has been changed in this line is that the obsolete second "DUMP:" is now missing. > ``You be the judge.'' What now? Re-include the "DUMP:"? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511300047.BAA17196>