From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Apr 13 14: 3:17 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7856914C91; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 14:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from billf@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from billf@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) id OAA29538;
	Tue, 13 Apr 1999 14:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from billf@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 14:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: <billf@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <199904132100.OAA29538@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: billf@jade.chc-chimes.com, billf@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, billf@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/11116: gtk interversion compatibility never works
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: gtk interversion compatibility never works

State-Changed-From-To: open->suspended
State-Changed-By: billf
State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 13 13:58:47 PDT 1999
State-Changed-Why: 
This seems to be a 2.2.8-STABLE only problem. Maybe.

However, I do still feel the rant at the bottom regarding the excess gtk
ports is still valid.


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->billf
Responsible-Changed-By: billf
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Apr 13 13:58:47 PDT 1999
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
I'll see if I can make this work for 2.2.x users without losing the
other branches.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message