From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 2 1:10: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from oskar.dev.nanoteq.co.za (oskar.dev.nanoteq.co.za [196.7.114.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF1B150FE; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 01:09:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rbezuide@oskar.dev.nanoteq.co.za) Received: (from rbezuide@localhost) by oskar.dev.nanoteq.co.za (8.9.3/8.9.0) id LAA05726; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:04:37 +0200 (SAT) From: Reinier Bezuidenhout Message-Id: <199912020904.LAA05726@oskar.dev.nanoteq.co.za> Subject: Re: Linux ioctl not implemented error In-Reply-To: from Alfred Perlstein at "Dec 2, 99 00:45:57 am" To: bright@wintelcom.net (Alfred Perlstein) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:04:37 +0200 (SAT) Cc: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl, groudier@club-internet.fr, FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, marcel@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > + { > > + u_char channel0; > > + u_char channel1; > > + u_char channel2; > > + u_char channel3; > > + }; > > + > > struct linux_cdrom_subchnl > > { > > u_char cdsc_format; > > *************** > > *** 1232,1237 **** > > --- 1240,1261 ---- > > FYI the kernel structures are completely identical, you don't really > gain anything by doing this convertion. Should this be put in for > clarity? I'm not sure. > Ok ... I guess it should not be a problem the FreeBSD structure is struct ioc_vol { u_char vol[4]; /* one for each channel */ }; which I guess should look the same in memory than the linux one ... The confersion is then not necessary ... ?? Reinier To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message