From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 15:35:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575A037B433 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elk.hughes.com.au (elk.hughes.com.au [198.78.66.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEB243F3F for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:35:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bambi@Hughes.com.au) Received: from elk.hughes.com.au (elk [198.78.66.227]) by elk.hughes.com.au (8.12.6/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h74MZHWN008702; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:35:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bambi@Hughes.com.au) Received: from localhost (bambi@localhost)h74MZHeL008699; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:35:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: elk.hughes.com.au: bambi owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:35:17 -0700 (PDT) From: "David J. Hughes" To: Blaz Zupan In-Reply-To: <20030804182222.A5C055553E@titanic.medinet.si> Message-ID: <20030804152939.F97726@elk.hughes.com.au> References: <20030804182222.A5C055553E@titanic.medinet.si> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS Server Farm X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 22:35:21 -0000 On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Blaz Zupan wrote: > Anycast is the solution in this case. Build lots and lots of small > recursive nameserver boxes and locate them at various points around your > network. Each of those boxes has two IP addresses: one from the local An anycast / BGP solution assumes that the application will never fail without taking the box down. If your DNS code falls over (or is stopped etc) then your customers are going to lose. Seeing as a "real" load balancer, like a ServerIron XL, can be found on Ebay for next to nothing these days, it's a very workable solution. We just built such a solution for a network with about 550,000 users and it works just fine. 2 or 3 good boxes and a load balancer will also be much cheaper than a box at each pop. Bambi ...