From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 29 19:49:23 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2657C106566B;
	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:49:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from patpro@patpro.net)
Received: from rack.patpro.net (rack.patpro.net [193.30.227.216])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3A58FC08;
	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:49:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rack.patpro.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by rack.patpro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB261CC020;
	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:49:21 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at patpro.net
Received: from amavis-at-patpro.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by rack.patpro.net (rack.patpro.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 8tk1McEoSH9N; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:49:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by rack.patpro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP;
	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:49:19 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-7-357277473;
	protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
From: Patrick Proniewski <patpro@patpro.net>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
In-Reply-To: <696682733.20110629182327@serebryakov.spb.ru>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:49:19 +0200
Message-Id: <5AD25EEF-D753-4480-9809-613447A470AC@patpro.net>
References: <1191160420.20110629145915@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<B906D82B-077A-458C-BE67-EC27A825B4A8@patpro.net>
	<696682733.20110629182327@serebryakov.spb.ru>
To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: Liste FreeBSD-security <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: OpenBSM: does somebody work on it?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:49:23 -0000


--Apple-Mail-7-357277473
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8

On 29 juin 2011, at 16:23, Lev Serebryakov wrote:

> Hello, Patrick.
> You wrote 29 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD=D1=8F 2011 =D0=B3., 16:26:44:
>=20
>> I do, almost (I've not finished my settup, but I'm auditing a =
production server).
>> May be you'll find this interesting:
>> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D23716#9
> It seems, even system ftpd doesn't use setaudit() :(

as long as it uses login to log users into the system, I don't think it =
needs to use setaudit(). But I'm no BSM guru at all :)
The audit system starts auditing a user as soon at he(r) logs in on the =
system.
I'll give ftpd a try if I have some spare time.

patpro=

--Apple-Mail-7-357277473--