Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:04:47 -0500 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: John Merryweather Cooper <john_m_cooper@yahoo.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE Message-ID: <20060712230447.GA38540@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <44B578EE.202@yahoo.com> References: <200607130024.18047.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <44B578EE.202@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:34:22PM -0500, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
> Dejan Lesjak wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >There were a couple of debates already concerning /usr/X11R6 as prefix f=
or=20
> >X11 ports and a bunch of other ports that currently by default install=
=20
> >there. Quite some people were, when creating a new port that depends on=
=20
> >X11, wandering whether to put it in X11BASE or LOCALBASE. More than once=
a=20
> >question of whether the prefix /usr/X11R6 should be just dropped or at=
=20
> >least only retained for core X11 distribution. With the upcoming X.org 7=
=2Ex=20
> >ports there is perhaps the opportunity to do the prefix merger along tha=
t.
> >Moving X11 prefix to LOCALBASE would simplify above dilemma. It would be=
=20
> >also more similar to where linux distributions are going (at least Gento=
o,=20
> >Debian and Fedora deprecated /usr/X11R6 in favour of /usr which, while=
=20
> >not /usr/local is the location of where all packages install - depending=
=20
> >on X11 or not). If I remember correctly from previous discussions, it=20
> >would be more convenient to people with separate mounts for installed=20
> >packages as well. /usr/local is also the default value for --prefix=20
> >configure option for X.org packages.
> >So it is general intention to go with /usr/local or rather ${LOCALBASE} =
as=20
> >prefix for X11 ports. If anyone feels that this is horribly wrong, pleas=
e=20
> >speak up.
> >
> >On behalf of x11 team,
> >Dejan
> > =20
> What impact (if any) would the doubling or tripling of the number of=20
> files in ./bin have on searching along PATH? Would we be shooting=20
> ourselves in the foot if we did this?
Since /usr/X11R6/bin is already in the default path I don't see how
it would make any difference.
-- Brooks
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFEtYAOXY6L6fI4GtQRArySAKC2L34orV4xECxOBaqJ0goRk0MK/gCfShet
hUvxpyEyJ91yRCQrvEUYayY=
=wBkm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060712230447.GA38540>