Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:08:15 +1100
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        bde@zeta.org.au, dfr@nlsystems.com
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Proposed change to printf
Message-ID:  <199903112108.IAA19103@godzilla.zeta.org.au>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> >@@ -1016,7 +1019,10 @@
>> > 			flags |= SHORTINT;
>> > 			goto rflag;
>> > 		case 'l':
>> >-			flags |= LONGINT;
>> >+			if (flags & LONGINT)
>> >+				flags |= QUADINT;
>> >+			else
>> >+				flags |= LONGINT;
>> > 			goto rflag;
>> > 		case 'q':
>> > 			flags |= QUADINT;
>> 
>> This assumes that long longs have the same representation as quad_t's.
>> I suppose not doing a global change from quad_t to long long is best,
>> because the change should actually be to C9x's intmax_t to support C9x's
>> %m formats.
>
>So is the patch correct enough to commit then?

Yes.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903112108.IAA19103>